On Tuesday 04 July 2006 02:40, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Michael Vince wrote: > > HTT was Intels best early stab to help path the way for their multi > > core technologies to come into use as quickly as possible for the > > masses over just the server end. > > Exactly, thats why i wouldn't spend too much time bothering with HTT. It > was a transitional technology for multi core CPUs, which are now the > standard. It will be interesting how the new Conroe processors fair on > FreeBSD, the early benchmarks show better performance than AMDs offerings.
For conroe, google the "fair-cache", you may find what should be done in scheduler, that's one of many reasons why I was saying libpthread should be stopped. Unless conroe is very special and does not need this work. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
