On Oct 25, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Dave wrote:
On Oct 25, 2006, at 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs
with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share
the
first results. The first tests are for serving up static data.
Thanks very much for this!
Can we possible see a dmesg output as well, just for completeness?
Here you go:
There are a couple of things you could try to increase performance -
they're probably all documented on the mysql tuning page. One thing
you could do would be to set:
kern.timecounter.choice=TSC
kern.timecounter.smp_tsc=1
which is usually an optimization on the machines where the hardware
supports it.
In my case, it was performance went down slightly. I have played with
some of Robert Watson's time patches and I do see a small boost (44786
-> 45179).
I'd be interested in measuring and optimizing for this workload but I
have no idea how to set it up (my time is also limited for the next
few weeks). If you're interested in e.g. giving me access to your
test setup then we could try to work something out.
I might take you up on that offer when I have a few cycles but that will
be at least a few weeks. :(
--
Dave
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
