On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:29:36AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:16:10 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:42:00AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:55:46 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > On the same test postgresql is indeed faster, I haven't finished > > > > benchmarking it yet though. > > > > > > Kris, I'm interested at postgresql benchmarking at two-xeon-quad-core > > > server with 3WARE RAID adapter. Can you give me some tips? > > > Thank you. > > > Well I'm using sysbench and the collection of patches in my > > kris-contention p4 branch. Sorry, I don't have an extracted patch set > > available for you to try, but we're hoping to get the most important > > patches into 7.0 within a week or two. > > > On the pgsql side, disable the update_process_titles option (or > > whatever it is called), because this has a 33% performance overhead > > for me. Also if you're testing over localhost, use a unix socket > > As for me, I don't like testing with local clients.
If that's not the target workload you're trying to model, that's quite reasonable. For me the only reason I have been using localhost exclusively is because the test machines are currently only connected by 100baseTX ethernet, which is not good enough for achieving high query loads. Kris _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
