Kris Kennaway wrote:
One major difference is that your workload is 100% user. Also you were
reporting ULE had more idle time, which looks like a bug since I would
expect it be basically 0% idle on such a workload.
Kris
We can not ignore this performance bug, also I had found that ULE is
slower than 4BSD when testing super-smack's update benchmark on my
dual-core machine.
Regards,
David Xu
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
