On 31/01/2008, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 10:16 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niki Denev wrote: > > > > > HZ=1000 > > > Time: > > > 239 seconds total > > > 122 seconds of transactions (4 per second) > > > > > What do you think? > > > > This is a very low result :) I don't know your machine or the parameters > > you used with postmark but even FreeBSD on two striped 7.5 kRPM drives > > can achieve ~~ 110 tps (so ~~ 50 for a single drive). In the same > > circumstances and with the right file system - reiserfs in this case - > > Linux can achieve close to 900 tps (170 tps with ext3). This is the kind > > of difference I am talking about. A change of 4 tps to 6 tps is not > > generally useful. > > > > > > What settings are you using for postmark? > I ran postmark with default settings, and only changed "size" to "4096 > 4096000", so it could create > files varying in size from 4K to 3.9M
Ok, under these circumstances+gjournal it's maybe possible to get numbers that low. I am testing operations on small files so my whole configuration is: set size 4096 65536 set read 8192 set write 8192 set number 10000 set transactions 40000 set subdirectories 1000 _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
