Greetings,

In my desire to increase network throughput, and to be able to handle more then ~250-270kpps I started experimenting with lagg and link aggregation control protocol (lacp). To my surprise this doesn't increase the amount of packets my server can handle

Here is what netstat reports:

netstat -w1 -I lagg0
           input        (lagg0)           output
  packets  errs      bytes    packets  errs      bytes colls
   267180     0   16030806     254056     0   14735542     0
   266875     0   16012506     253829     0   14722260     0

netstat -w1 -I em0
           input          (em0)           output
  packets  errs      bytes    packets  errs      bytes colls
   124789 72976    7487340     115329     0    6690468     0
   126860 67350    7611600     114769     0    6658002     0

netstat -w1 -I em2
           input          (em2)           output
  packets  errs      bytes    packets  errs      bytes colls
   123695 65533    7421700     113575     0    6584856     0
   130277 62646    7816626     113648     0    6592280     0
   123545 64171    7412706     113714     0    6596174     0

Using lagg doesn't improve situation at all, and also errors are not reported.
Also using lagg increased content switches:

procs      memory      page                   disk   faults      cpu
r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad4 in sy cs us sy id 1 0 0 81048 1914640 52 0 0 0 50 0 0 3036 37902 13512 1 20 79 0 0 0 81048 1914640 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 9582 83 22166 0 56 44 0 0 0 81048 1914640 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 9594 80 22028 0 55 45 0 0 0 81048 1914640 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 9593 82 22095 0 56 44

Top showed for CPU states +55%   system, which is quite high?

I'll use hwpmc and lock_profiling to see where the kernel spends it's time.

--

Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177

_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to