On 02/06/08 04:57, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
One other usual suspect is BIND9's "acache" if you enable it and the
server also acts as a (busy) authoritative server. Is this the case
for you? (But again, it should also cause the same problem for 9.4.2,
so I don't think this is the reason, either)
No, this is a caching only nameserver (but have some RFC1918 reverse
zones defined as empty to overcome problems with IANA's blackhole servers).
Then named will listen on [your_ip_address]:some_port, and you can
browse internal statistics by accessing
http://[your_ip_address]:some_port with your browser. When you notice
the memory starts growing, retrieving the information several times,
and compare the "Memory" section at the end of the page. If the
memory hog is inside named, there should be significant growth in some
of the rows accordingly.
Here are the results:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/bind950-memory-20080212/
and at the end, the relevant line from top.
Is this FreeBSD leaking then?
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630 306 6758
http://www.fsn.hu/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
