Valerio Daelli wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Valerio Daelli wrote:
> As you can see they are much faster than NFS.
> Then I have done a test with a Solaris 10 client and a Solaris 10 server:
>
> ---
> SOLARIS
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17:00:34:~ /usr/local/bin/iozone -r 2m -+q 1 -i 0 -n 2048
-g
> 8m -Raceb iozone.xls -f
> /mnt/nest.ifom-ieo-campus.it/iozone.solaris/iozone.tmp
> random
> random bkwd record stride
> KB reclen write rewrite read reread read
> write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread
> 2048 2048 38507 38278
> 4096 2048 54309 63908
> 8192 2048 60082 69817
>
What NFS parameters?
Kris
Sorry:
NFS via TCP
/mnt/nest.ifom-ieo-campus.it on
nest.ifom-ieo-campus.it:/data/export/hosts/bsd7.ifom-ieo-campus.it/
remote/read/write/setuid/devices/rsize=32768/wsize=32768/xattr/dev=4700003
on Thu Feb 21 11:01:04 2008
Thanks, and can you remind me what your FreeBSD performance numbers are
with TCP + 32k rsize/wsize?
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
