alan bryan wrote: > --- alan bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've got a 4 disk RAID 10 array.
> Version 1.93d ------Sequential Output------ > --Sequential Input- --Random- > Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per > Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- > Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP > K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP > server 16G 530 99 120160 23 28207 8 903 99 > 109688 16 518.7 18 > So, it's better but am I still getting what I should > be seeing? It seems about right - twice the performance of a single drive is OK for a 4-drive RAID10.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
