Benjeman J. Meekhof wrote: > Hi, > > I posted earlier about some results with this same system using UFS2. > Now trying to test ZFS. This is a Dell PE2950 with two Perc6 > controllers and 4 md1000 disk shelves with 750GB drives. 16GB RAM, dual > quad core Xeon. I recompiled our kernel to use the ULE scheduler instead > of default. > > I could not get through an entire run of iozone without a system > reboot/crash. ZFS is clearly labeled experimental, of course. > > It seems to die for sure around 10 processes, sometimes less (this is > the end of my output from iozone): > > Children see throughput for 10 readers = 135931.72 KB/sec > Parent sees throughput for 10 readers = 135927.24 KB/sec > Min throughput per process = 13351.26 KB/sec > Max throughput per process = 14172.05 KB/sec > Avg throughput per process = 13593.17 KB/sec > Min xfer = 31586816.00 KB
Can you tell us how does this compare to UFS2 results you posted previously? (since you used dd for UFS2 and now iozone for ZFS; what are your conclusions?)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
