I'm sorry. I didn't run it. I should have but a journal was required. I could have used FFS w GEOM Journal but I was winging this in my free time while performing my "job". (Bored easily, and easily interested when something just "feels" wrong) So, I went with ZFS due to the gobs of memory on the machine.
Paul ________________________________ From: "dieter...@engineer.com" <dieter...@engineer.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Sent: Fri, January 7, 2011 7:33:39 PM Subject: Re: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs Paul: > EXT3 - ~3000 tps > EXT4 - ~3800 tps > XFS - ~ 1800 tps > ZFS - 75000 tps The result for FFS w/softdeps seems to have been lost in the mail. :-( Mark: > They certainly have earned the title Moronix either way. For me, getting a debugging flag wrong (assuming they did, there seems to be some question) pales in comparison with "my adventure to the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Site". There's a reason I think of linux types as bird brains, and it isn't just because of Tux. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"