On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees <cr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it >> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive >> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS. >> > > > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity? > > You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the > point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons. > > A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates.
Wouldn't UFS+SUJ be the closest atch? -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
