Il 06 aprile 2012 18:54, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Attilio Rao <atti...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Il 05 aprile 2012 19:03, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the >>> `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking >>> down various kind of regression/improvement. `hackbench' is a >>> scheduler + IPC test (socket xor pipe). It creates producers/consumers >>> groups and let a variable quantity of small messages flow happily. >>> Producers and consumers are either processes xor threads. >>> >>> Tested platforms were >>> - Atom D510, Intel, (incomplete) >>> - Core 2 Quad Q9560, Intel >>> - Soekris net5501, AMD (incomplete) >>> - Xeon E5645, Intel (incomplete) >>> - Xeon E5620 (dual package), Intel >>> - Xeon E5-1650 (pending completion) >>> - Vortex86, DMP >>> >>> Tested kernel were: >>> - FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE >>> - FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE >>> - FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 and FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE >>> - FreeBSD 10-CURRENT as of r231573 >> >> Which means you run 10-CURRENT with all the kernel debugging options >> on and MALLOC_DEBUG on? >> > I already answered that question. Namely: > > << > note: rule [I] is alleviated for -CURRENT kernels, which were built > with the same alteration made to GENERIC during the CURRENT->RELEASE > transition (ie. WITNESS and a couple of other option disabled). >>> > > this translates into the following patch (for amd64):
Did you enable MALLOC_PRODUCTION and rebuilt libc? Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
