On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Lev Serebryakov <l...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hello, Lev. > You wrote 8 июля 2013 г., 1:02:24: > > LS> Hello, Lev. > LS> You wrote 7 июля 2013 г., 23:37:04: > > LS>> So, smbd is NOT limited by: > LS>> (1) FS (33MiB/s vs 280MiB/s). > LS>> (2) Network (33MiB/s vs 820Mbit/s / 97MiB/s). > LS>> (3) CPU (50% vs 100%, CPU is 150% idle!). > LS>> Why samba performacne is so loosy? What could > LS> I've "ktrace" smbd process in question and see a lot of > Ok, poll() takes 98.5% of time spent by samba process! Is it Ok?! > And getegid()/geteuid() is takes 30% of calls (but only 0.1% of time)! > But this poll() prevalence is not clear to me. So, it wait something most > of time? What? > > -- > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <l...@freebsd.org> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > Lev What can you tell us about the system tunings. Can you post a copy of your 1. sysctl.conf 2. loader.conf 3. smb.conf 4. /etc/fstab Also the output from 1. pciconf -lv 2. dmidecode 3. ifconfig 4. mount sanitize them as needed. -- mark saad | nones...@longcount.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
