I posted this in freebsd.question earlier and wish more people may see this and make comment, but got no answer. Now narrow to performance group.
It looks like not just X server is slow on 10.2-R, other servers slow too and take a lot of CPU.forefox is play music from youtube, while thunderbird connected to imapd and doing nothing. Those services take less than 10% total CPU when running 8.4 / 10.1. Is something under 10.2-R needs to be tuned for performance? or this hardware combination cause 10.2 -R not working well. Some hardware information is toward the end of this email (in the original part). -Jin 8.4-Release top output for the same applications: last pid: 1233; load averages: 0.47, 0.46, 0.25 up 0+00:05:21 23:22:11 58 processes: 1 running, 57 sleeping CPU: 4.5% user, 0.0% nice, 2.5% system, 0.4% interrupt, 92.6% idle Mem: 317M Active, 303M Inact, 750M Wired, 1944K Cache, 651M Buf, 6485M Free Swap: 12G Total, 12G Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1104 jin 29 44 0 457M 323M ucond 3 1:11 26.27% firefox 1066 jin 1 46 0 371M 328M select 3 0:17 3.08% Xorg 1209 jin 26 44 0 289M 162M ucond 1 0:14 0.00% thunderbir 1211 jin 1 44 0 18348K 4896K select 2 0:01 0.00% imapd 1216 jin 1 44 0 18348K 4672K select 1 0:00 0.00% imapd 864 root 1 44 0 8080K 1404K select 0 0:00 0.00% moused------------------------------------- vs --------------------------------------- 10.2-Release top output (2 in a couple of minutes away): last pid: 1088; load averages: 1.93, 1.07, 0.53 up 0+00:05:16 22:49:12 58 processes: 3 running, 55 sleeping CPU: 19.9% user, 0.0% nice, 61.0% system, 0.3% interrupt, 18.8% idle Mem: 402M Active, 513M Inact, 528M Wired, 192K Cache, 821M Buf, 6440M Free Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 951 jin 75 20 0 711M 365M uwait 3 1:17 115.23% firefox 1083 jin 1 89 0 36688K 5988K CPU0 0 0:47 55.37% imapd 1081 jin 1 88 0 36688K 5988K CPU2 2 0:47 52.59% imapd 1077 jin 44 21 0 555M 271M uwait 1 0:19 21.14% thunderbi 923 jin 5 20 0 460M 363M uwait 0 0:09 2.20% Xorg 777 root 1 20 0 16728K 2236K select 2 0:00 0.00% moused last pid: 1090; load averages: 3.67, 2.11, 1.04 up 0+00:07:51 22:51:47 58 processes: 3 running, 55 sleeping CPU: 19.9% user, 0.0% nice, 63.8% system, 0.6% interrupt, 15.7% idle Mem: 604M Active, 592M Inact, 576M Wired, 192K Cache, 820M Buf, 6110M Free Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 951 jin 73 20 0 708M 364M uwait 2 4:22 112.79% firefox 1083 jin 1 101 0 36688K 5988K CPU2 2 2:46 94.78% imapd 1081 jin 1 101 0 36688K 5988K CPU0 0 2:46 94.48% imapd 1077 jin 41 24 0 767M 481M uwait 3 1:02 34.62% thunderbi 923 jin 5 20 0 452M 355M uwait 1 0:12 2.10% Xorg On Saturday, August 15, 2015 10:01 PM, Jin Guojun <jguo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: A machine with AMD A8-6600K with Radeon + Nvidia GeForce 210 graphic card.It works with FreeBSD 8.4-R .. 10.1-R well; however, after upgraded to 10.2-R, X Window seems having problem in doing configuration and running server. In X -configure, the xorg.conf.new generated correctly, but have error at the end says "number of screen s does not match number of devices. It found two screens and two devices (see log below), so not sure what is the problem. When startx, moving window around and scrolling window (using sliding bar) are very sluggish.When exist X window, server generate a non-error error: [ 2700.740] (EE) Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file. Does this mean that a Xorg 7.7_2 has some defect? Does anyone encounter the similar issue in 10.2-Release? -Jin _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"