On 7 Mar 2017, at 18:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 2017/03/07 08:10:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:14:44AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions
of
Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived
connections.
FreeBSD is the worst in this test.
https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html
https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png
https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png
https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png
https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf
Is this you test?
No, it is not mine test. I just found it on the internet.
The work was presented at the latest AsiaBSDCon and several of us are
working the sephe@, who is a FreeBSD committer on improving the
benchmark's fidelity as well as addressing the issues that are
highlighted.
Look for P05C: 10 Years with DragonFlyBSD network stack
https://2017.asiabsdcon.org/program.html.en#
Best,
George
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
