On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM, <v...@tesla.cujae.edu.cu> wrote: > Vlad Galu <d...@dudu.ro> ha escrito: > >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:57 AM, <v...@tesla.cujae.edu.cu> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks! >>> >>> I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in >>> a >>> similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does? >>> >>> Does pf supports this feature? >>> >>> My intentions are to tag an outgoing packet, transfer the tag to the hole >>> connection and then use that tag to mark incoming packets belonging to >>> the >>> same connection. >>> >>> Also, i would like then to use that mark to enqueue marked packets to >>> hfsc >>> clases. >>> >>> I´ve done all of this in linux but never on freebsd, I´ve searched in >>> pf´s >>> man page and the FAQ without success. >>> >>> thanks in advance, >>> >>> evelio vila >> >> Hi evelio, see below: >> -- cut here -- >> tag <string> >> Packets matching this rule will be tagged with the specified >> string. The tag acts as an internal marker that can be used to >> identify these packets later on. This can be used, for >> example, to >> provide trust between interfaces and to determine if packets >> have >> been processed by translation rules. Tags are "sticky", meaning >> that the packet will be tagged even if the rule is not the last >> matching rule. Further matching rules can replace the tag with >> a >> new one but will not remove a previously applied tag. A packet >> is >> only ever assigned one tag at a time. Packet tagging can be >> done >> during nat, rdr, or binat rules in addition to filter rules. >> Tags >> take the same macros as labels (see above). >> >> tagged <string> >> Used with filter or translation rules to specify that packets >> must >> already be tagged with the given tag in order to match the rule. >> Inverse tag matching can also be done by specifying the ! >> operator >> before the tagged keyword. >> -- and here -- >> >> Anyway, I believe that keeping state for the desired outgoing >> connections should be enough all by itself. You would simply add the > > Indeed no, what i want is also to mark the connection to be able then > to mark incoming packets beloging to the same connection. > >> "queue <queue>" directive at the end of your pass out rule, even >> though the interface packets go out through is the "external" one, and >> you want to do shaping on the "internal" one but, as I understand, for >> that you also need floating (not if-bound) states. If I'm wrong, I'd > > i am not sure what you mean with "floating (not if-bound) states" > could you please explain this. >> >> like somebody with better pf knowledge to correct me :)
pf(4) is not iptables. So before using it read more about it. http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/ http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf > thanks for your quick answer vlad. > > evelio vila > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > VI Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y > Educación Energética > 9 - 12 de Junio 2009, Palacio de las Convenciones > ...Por una cultura energética sustentable > www.ciercuba.com_______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Ermal _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
