On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:44:13PM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote: > E> Cherry-picking would be when tehre is reasonable similarities. > E> Also another argument to do this would be simplicity on locking as well > as > E> i told you when you started the changes. > > You were wrong. OpenBSD doesn't move towards SMP model. Locking more > recent pf is not simplier, but the opposite. > > I am sorry but you are asking arguments i already have given you. You didn;t listen once and i do not expect this time as well. > E> Though i am open to work together on this to merge the new syntax > thorugh a > E> whole bulk merge rather than cherry-pick. > > How many bugs have you closed after the previous bulk import? Why should > we expect anything good from new import if the previous one was a PITA? > > Well you have used it for your work so it was not so PITA. Most of the ones you closed had message 'This is to old to be true'; 'I have re-written PF and this should be fixed'. > And still I don't see any answer on the question: what exact features or > perfomance improvements are we going to obtain from "the new pf"? > > See above. > E> You already have 'broken' some functionality as if-bound in FreeBSD > 10.x so > > Is there any PR filed on that? I didn't even receive a mail about that. > > I really do not think you do the right approach or the right communication on this. Sorry for replying to you ;). > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > -- Ermal _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
