Damien Fleuriot <m...@my.gd> wrote: > > Would you kindly elaborate on the quick keyword in conjunction with > anchors ? > > I would assume that makes all the rules within the anchor quick ?
Using "quick" in the rule that calls an anchor is not the same as making all the rules in the anchor "quick." It instead means that whatever decision is made by the anchor will be final, and rules following the call out to the anchor will not be examined. But processing of rules within the anchor will follow standard rules of quick/non-quick. My opinion is that, when designing PF rulesets, you should choose to either always use quick, or never use quick, else you may end up easily confusing yourself. -- David DeSimone == Network Admin == f...@verio.net "I don't like spinach, and I'm glad I don't, because if I liked it I'd eat it, and I just hate it." -- Clarence Darrow This email message is intended for the use of the person to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Verio Inc. makes no warranty that this email is error or virus free. Thank you. _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
