Cool, thanks for the feedback. I'll try the patch in the host environment. I never really used pf inside the jails, so I don't have a test case for that failing.
5 feb 2014 kl. 10:16 skrev mm [via FreeBSD] <[email protected]>: > Ok, I have found the cause. The patches I use fix the host pf, but pf inside > jails is broken. This means if we expose the pf device to the jails, calling > pfctl on it causes a panic. > > To make sure your jails get just the limited ruleset, I suggest you put the > following line to your /etc/rc.conf: > devfs_load_rulesets="YES" > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/VIMAGE-PF-crash-in-mbuf-destructor-tp5830537p5883192.html > To unsubscribe from VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor, click here. > NAML signature.asc (506 bytes) <http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5883198/0/signature.asc> -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/VIMAGE-PF-crash-in-mbuf-destructor-tp5830537p5883198.html Sent from the freebsd-pf mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
