On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:39:14AM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 26.02.2014 02:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> The port was updated on Feb 11 -- two weeks ago. Why is the builder > >> > still using the six-months old version? Thanks! > >> > > > Because it is the quarterly branch so the fix needs to be mfh, all > > instructions > > about that where sent to ports-developers@ > I'm not even subscribed to ports-developers@ -- haven't even heard of > the list, to be honest. For two decades ports remained a single branch > -- a change of this magnitude should, perhaps, have been communicated to > each maintainer (via certified mail, return-receipt requested). > > Anyway, is there a documentation page describing this new procedure > somewhere? Thanks! > > -mi >
You are automatically subscribed, the this is you have your redirection set to /dev/null apparently, so for sure you have missed a couple of mails regards, Bapt
pgppWR4MoDtFn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
