On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:32:18 +0100 Lexi Winter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark Millard wrote in <[email protected]>: > > But the following indicates that the cached *.pkg files themselves > > agree with the just-4-vitals status: > > do you build your packages with "make update-packages"? if so, can you > try deleting your ${REPODIR} and rebuilding, so all packages are > recreated? > > i'm wondering if adding the vital flag (but not changing anything else) > doesn't cause update-packages to actually update the package. Vital flag isn't taken into account for calculating the internal checksum (See https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/blob/main/libpkg/pkg_checksum.c#L197) we should probably add it there. Cheers, > > Also of note is the lack of a new-line between the prior } and the > > name: for most of the above. An example of a surrounding context is: > > > > categories: [ > > "base" > > ] > > annotations: { > > FreeBSD_version: "1600000" > > }name: "FreeBSD-set-base-dbg" > > origin: "base" > > it looks the UCL output from 'pkg info' doesn't have a trailing newline. > i think this is a pkg(8) bug, but it shouldn't have anything to do with > this issue. > > to confirm, this is the full output i get for the set-src package, using > 'echo' to force a trailing newline: > > # pkg info -R -F > /build/packages/base/FreeBSD:16:amd64/latest/FreeBSD-set-src-16.snap20250919160159.pkg; > echo > name: "FreeBSD-set-src" > origin: "base" > version: "16.snap20250919160159" > comment: "System source code" > maintainer: "[email protected]" > www: "https://www.FreeBSD.org"; > abi: "FreeBSD:16:amd64" > arch: "freebsd:16:x86:64" > prefix: "/" > flatsize: 0 > licenselogic: "single" > licenses: [ > "BSD2CLAUSE" > ] > vital: true > desc: "This metapackage installs source code for the base system and kernel." > deps: { > FreeBSD-src: { > origin: "base", > version: "16.snap20250919160159" > }, > FreeBSD-src-sys: { > origin: "base", > version: "16.snap20250919160159" > } > } > categories: [ > "base" > ] > annotations: { > FreeBSD_version: "1600000" > } > # > > other than the vital flag, does this match what you have? -- Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
