Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>>> Thanks for the reply. >>>> >>>> That means I don't have to take care of it, still it would make more >>>> sense to let the ports take care of it. >>> If we're going to do it, setting MAN variables should cause it to happen >>> in bsd.port.mk rather than having it done adhoc. >>> >>> -- Brooks >> That's what I was expecting in the first place. And it should be trivial to >> accomplish for someone who has the privileges to work on the Ports system. > > Everyone have privileges to work on the Ports system. :) >
I submitted a PR with a small patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=100594 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
