On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:53:32 -0500, Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports.  Has the port team ever
thought about:

A) Making a delete port pr request.  This way port maintainers INSTEAD
of marking 'transfer ownership to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and hoping
somebody takes it over one day could actually just delete ports they no
longer wish to maintain.  There should be some sort of WARN marking
mechanism though (valid for X months (maybe 6)) that notifies any new
user (or current via a portupgrade and EPOCH bumb) that this port is no
longer maintained and scheduled for deletion unless one of them takes
over maitainership by DATE.

B) In line with A, has anybody thought about just marking ALL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as scheduled for deletion on X date.  Thousands of
people are using these ports, you can't tell me if they were actually
scheduled to be deleted from the tree at least one of the users
wouldn't take over maintainership.

I disagree with all of this, because ports@ or unmaintain don't mean they are broke. They work fine, so no reason to delete them. When it is broke then can add scheduled for deletion on X date until someone steps in and fix it without take the maintain.

Cheers,
Mezz

-Peter

Just some ideas (as I have ports I own that I no longer care about and
would like to delete),

-Peter


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team  -  FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to