Peter Matulis wrote:
[ snip ]
my secondary MX is a FreeBSD box with no such protection and I fear
that
the spammers will just take advantage of the fact that my secondary
MX
has weaker protections than my primary.
Yes, best practice is to configure all MX servers in the same way.
Especially so if you plan to give spam servers a punch in the face
(stuttering, greylisting, etc). I am also interested in spamd but will
not use it because I do not have control of the other mailservers.
Well, I found out the hard way. I configured my primary mailserver to
use a few of the less political rbls and found that the spammers adapted
by hitting my secondary MX....
-- Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
