Hi, Currently I get this:
% portversion -v gnupg gnupg-1.4.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.0.1) gnupg-2.0.1 = up-to-date with port % This is incorrect and is caused by the fact that portupgrade is not aware that security/gnupg has been moved to security/gnupg1. If I apply the following patch: Index: MOVED =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/pcvs/ports/MOVED,v retrieving revision 1.1225 diff -u -1 -r1.1225 MOVED --- MOVED 26 Dec 2006 02:41:42 -0000 1.1225 +++ MOVED 27 Dec 2006 09:58:39 -0000 @@ -2617,2 +2617,3 @@ devel/stlport-icc||2006-12-20|Has expired: does not work with stlport 4.6.2 +security/gnupg|security/gnupg1|2006-12-20|foobar security/gnupg-devel|security/gnupg|2006-12-21|gnupg-devel has been released as Gnupg 2.0 I get this: % portversion -v gnupg gnupg-1.4.6_2 < needs updating (port has 1.4.6_3) (=> 'security/gnupg1') gnupg-2.0.1 > succeeds port (port has 1.4.6_3) (=> 'security/gnupg1') % which is weird... why does portversion think that gnupg-2.0.1 has something to do with security/gnupg1? -- Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] % A: Yes. | Q: Are you sure? | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
pgpzWE5I8RXCb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
