Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Saturday 07 April 2007 11:32:19 Ade Lovett wrote: >> On Apr 06, 2007, at 23:44 , Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> > Well, I've already expressed my opinion that threading be disabled. >> > Since FreeBSD doesn't allow mixing threaded libraries with non- >> > threaded >> > executables (without linking the executable with PTHREAD_LIBS) :-(, >> > threading is just dangerous. I don't think we want to force all ports >> > that link to libintl to become thread-aware. >> >> Yup. I think this is the way to go myself. I'd just like consensus >> from the KDE folks before I simply bump PORTREVISION and add -- >> disable-threads to CONFIGURE_ARGS. > > Sounds fine to me too. We've not had it threaded before, so not missed it > either. > > Unless lofi has some strong objection to this, consider this an ok from > kde@
Ok from me as well. FWIW, we'd probably be fine either way, since everything that links to qt already needs to link to a threads library. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"