Kurt Abahar wrote: > I have tried the portupgrade way, but unfortunately > the packages lag behind ports the majority of the > time.
It's actually 100% of the time, and always will be. > This led me to think that keeping the ports tree > a little behind HEAD would be a better solution. > However, I don't know how to get a hold of this "lag > time." Is it a few days, a few weeks or ... ? Maybe you can describe in more detail what you're trying to accomplish. Leave out potential solutions, just describe what your goal is. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"