On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:58:47 +0200 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Boris Samorodov píše v so 04. 08. 2007 v 01:30 +0400:
> > Seems that running ldconfig while building a package at package > > cluster (i.e. when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined) is quite useless. [1] > > > > To be more specific I'm interested at linux ports. ATM we run linux > > ldconfig (using linuxulator) _at package building_. Hence to create a > > package for FC6 port we should change compat.linux.osrelease (which I > > don't like and try to avoid). If the "ldconfig" stage may be skipped > > when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined then things get way too easier both > > for default kernel linux.osrelease and default linux_base port change. > I don't follow - what is the problem? An FC6 port can't be build (and more specific -- linux-fc6 ldconfig doesn't run) with current default compat.linux.osrelease=2.4.2. So this sysctl should be changed to 2.6.16 for package building sake. When the default compat.linux.osrelease will be switched to 2.6.16 we will get the other way round problem if we try to build and FC4 port. I don't like the status quo and want to find a way to siplify it. WBR -- bsam _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
