On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:52:18 -0500 "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Willy Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The thing that shocked me is the fact that the port is still in the > > ports tree > > even if it does not work! (It compiles but each try to view a Flash > > animation > > leads to a segmentation fault of Firefox). If we want the FreeBSD > > community to > > be focused on quality (I assume we all want), then this port should > > be removed > > from the ports tree or at least marked as broken. > > e the port should be marked broken for OSVERSION < 7000xx, and > compat.linux.osrelease = 2.4.2, as the flash9 plugin may require > 2.6.16 linux emulation. > No it shouldn't. I've never seen it crash a browser, and it works to a limited extent on some sites that can't be navigated without it. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
