On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:53:30PM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > On 10/27/07, Carlos A. M. dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/27/07, Alex Kozlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:33:46AM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Using the patch below it is possible to make x11/nvidia-driver > > > > independent of misc/compat5x, by means of some library mapping. I did > > > > this successfuly on 6.x but still did not test on 7.x. I would like to > > > > hear some comments before submitting a PR with a change request.
What is the problem using compat5x in the first place? > > > I think this is more correct variant: > > > > > > $cat /etc/libmap.conf > > > #nvidia-driver > > > [/usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1] > > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1] > > > libc.so.5 libc.so.6 > > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1] > > > libc.so.5 libc.so.6 > > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libnvidia-cfg.so.1] > > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > > Ah, I forgot that one. Good catch. > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so] > > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > librpcsvc.so.2 librpcsvc.so.3 That's potentially unsafe to put next .so version of library when the code expects previous one. It *may* work, but be prepared for all sorts of incompatibilities and ABI breakage. ./danfe _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"