Pav Lucistnik wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:05 -0800, Xin LI wrote > >> I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf) >> is a very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options >> across upgrade. Is there a reason behind not making it into >> bsd.ports.mk? IMHO it's a big deal to take the script into >> ports/Tools/scripts, and move the configuration to somewhere like >> /etc/ports.conf... > > I haven't checked it out yet. What can it do that can't be done in > /etc/make.conf with constructs like > > .if ${.CURDIR} == "/usr/ports/editors/vim" > WITH_GTK2=yes > .endif > > ?
Actually it can only do less than that (and it won't work if /usr/ports is a symlink, at least the last time I checked). The only advantage is a more compact (and simple) syntax. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"