> > That's why you do slave port with an option toggled, when you need a > > package you can depend on. OPTIONS haven't changed this aspect. > > But you can't readily specify option X enabled, option Y disabled on > that slave port.
You can, that's the point. > There may come a time when it's decided to either have vanilla > plists and seperate one(s) with options or dont track plists for non > default options at all. I bet most/many non-default ports don't get > properly packaged anyway as it is. Port needs to package cleanly with any combination of OPTIONS specified. If it doesn't, it needs to be fixed. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on the road via OpenWebMail _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
