On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:09:06 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:50:09 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
IMHO gio-fam-backend should not be implicit dependency. Otherwise why
not to install all existing non-conflicting libraries just to ease
maintainer's life :->
FWIW x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2 (PR 116120) do not need gio-fam-backend.
Well, all ports should depend on gio-fam-backend. The gio is included
and part of glib20. marcus had to split gio out of glib20 package to
avoid circle dependency of glib20 -> gamin (FAM replacement) -> glib20.
If marcus doesn't split and you guys will have that gio library anyway.
Uh, I should have check in glib20 and gio-fam-backend before I made that
comment. I thought that gio (libgio-2.0.so) is in gio-fam-backend, but not
it's in glib20. The gio-fam-backend only installs libgiofam.so and FAM
support is option in glib configure. I don't think it will be easy to make
optional (maybe I am wrong) with that split. Remove gio-fam-backend
dependency is going to hurt some users if they want some missing
fuction(s) of it.
Cheers,
Mezz
Just my 0.02$,
Alexey.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
