вівторок 22 квітень 2008 11:00 до, Andrew Pantyukhin Ви написали: > Also, the lzmautils website claims it's of alpha-quality, so I'm > also hesitant to rely on it completely. At any rate, I think > having a reference implementation of lzma util in ports is a good > thing. OTOH, changing lzmautils' lzma to another name would > probably confuse gtar (I'm not sure though).
Well, we can patch gtar to call glzma or some such... -mi ###################################################################### The information contained in this communication is confidential and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not a named addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. If you have received this communication, and are not a named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. ###################################################################### _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"