On Friday 23 May 2008, Juergen Lock wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >I have been scouring all the data I can, to find printers that do > > duplex printing (that means doublesided printing). I found 3 > > models, but two of them (the HP C7280 and the Canon PIXMA MX850) > > have no public drivers I can find. [...] > > Well, the HP C7280 seems to be supported by hplip: > http://hplip.sourceforge.net/models/photosmart/photosmart_c7200_se >ries.html > > hplip is in ports, > http://www.freshports.org/print/hplip > and an older version (1.7.4a) works fine here with an HP Officejet > 7310 connected via usb, the newer ones (those that no longer have > the hpiod daemon) tho log things like > > May 23 01:22:49 saturn > Officejet_7300_series?serial=MY62DQ70PB04HR: io/hpmud/musb.c 1057: > unable to open hp:/usb/Officejet_7300_series?serial=MY62DQ70PB04HR > May 23 01:22:50 saturn Officejet_7300_series?serial=MY62DQ70PB04HR: > prnt/backend/hp.c 636: INFO: open device failed; will retry in 30 > seconds... > > in syslog and print nothing. But since the hplip page for the > C7280 talks about network you probably can still use it that way, > as this certainly looks like an usb problem. > > To the hplip maintainer: I have taken out ulpt out of the kernel > and then configured the printer via hp-setup as root since I want > to be able to scan too (which incidentally still worked also with > the new version), so maybe things are different when only printing > via ulpt... (like you do when you configure the printer directly > via cups.) Googling the error message I finds quite a few hits for > various linux distros so apparently this is a common problem and > maybe we just have to wait for an upstream fix. > > If anyone has the same problem (and your printer is already > supported by 1.7.4a like mine), you can use anoncvs or > portdowngrade to checkout the old version of the hplip port, you > only need to patch the netsnmp.10 dependency in the port Makefile > to read netsnmp.16 if the rest of your ports are current. This sounds like a configuration problem. Please re-read the pkg-message and send me the requested information.
Thanks, -- Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] AM Productions http://am-productions.biz/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.