On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:42:33 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:09:11 -0500, Marcin Wisnicki > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If .warning breaks portupgrade I can change it to IGNORE. > > I prefer remove .warning and IGNORE. If user wants to enable keyring > then the WITH_KEYRING should be always enable PAM, no matter if user has > selected it disable. And, tweak comment in OPTIONS for (reqiure PAM).
OK, I've sent patches to PR. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=126114 As suggested, .warning was removed, option description improved and KEYRING will force PAM. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=126115 Like above, gnome-screensaver has similar .warning, but because of partially broken pam support, the logic is reversed: lack of pam will disable keyring. Also I've introduced some anti foot-shooting measures until the problem is fixed, so users of g-s won't end up with broken setup by selecting wrong options. Maybe options should be hidden behind GNOME_SCREENSAVER_WITH_BROKEN_PAM conditional ? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
