On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500 Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500 > > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes > > > > [ .. ] > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200: > > > > Hi, > > > > BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least): > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > > Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:45:17 +0300 (EEST) > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:06:07 +0300 (EEST) > > > > Did you received those emails ? > > I thought somebody else messed with my port and waited for him/her to > fix it :-) Sorry. My QAT Cc's the maintainer on commit-triggered BotMails. And sends mail only to maintainer for QA-triggered or dependency-triggered BotMails. Anyway, waiting some months for someone to fix your port might be a little to much ;-) More about the way QAT works here: http://t32.tecnik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/ > Which is kind of true, I didn't put these lines into pkg-plist. But > it seems to have been a multi-port sweep. Might be, I didn't check. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
