On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:47:56 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov <amd...@amdmi3.ru>
wrote:
* Garrett Cooper (yanef...@gmail.com) wrote:
> It's useful for me too sometimes, but it's already not 100% reliable,
> as some ports still generate it dynamically, some use PLIST_FILES,
some
> use PLIST_SUB so it's not apparent under which path and/or name the
file
> mentioned in plist is actually installed.
Getting rid of the plist files will force a major rewrite of
pkg_install. Are you really comfortable doing that :\?
Not getting rid but generating automatically. Many ports already
have no pkg-plist.
I mean by keep static pkg-plist (not get rid of it). I don't like dynamic
plist. I do not need to list my reasons as it's already in the archives by
someone and maybe me (not remember).
Cheers,
Mezz
--
me...@cox.net - m...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
