On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:38:02 -0600, Mikhail T. <mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com>
wrote:
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:16:43PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
The throbber is pretty important UI for a browser. If you break it,
people will complain.
Uhm, what is "throbber"? Could you elaborate?
The little spinning things in the tabs, or the right hand side of the
menu bar, which tell you that its loading a page.
Oh, I see. Well, if that thing requires APNG, then, indeed, it is
indispensable and the cat is, indeed, out of the bag... In that case we
should either make our own graphics/apng or add the patch to
graphics/png.
I rather to honor graphics/png (include PNG folks) and no way for
graphics/apng as it will be worst to have conflict in ports tree. It's
pain in ass. Keep in its tarball and compiles as static is fine. It's no
big deal and problem solve. As for the security, well, Mozilla usually
will release if there is hole. Of course, multi-port to update but it's
better than conflicts in ports tree. The apng is very low use in
applications, so again no problem either.
Cheers,
Mezz
-mi
--
me...@cox.net - m...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
