## Jan Henrik Sylvester (m...@janh.de): > >> Did you run portupgrade -rf libxcb? > > On a related note: I ran above command _before_ doing a full > > "portupgrade -a". A whole bunch of ports failed to upgrade because > A mixture of -rf and a -a upgrade is always problematic, unless you were > up-to-date before the library in question got updated.
I was quite close to being up-to-date (some hours), which has been close enough in all cases until now (that's why I csup once a day, so I can update to a point close before larger changes and then do whatever UPDATING suggests). > BTW: Doing -rf is usually a lot more compile(!) time consuming than > necessary, since indirect dependencies of a port usually (but only > usually) do not link against the library in question. If you (think you) > know what you are doing, you can try to find the ports that actually > link against an old library using 'libchk -v' (or pkg_libchk as > mentioned above). And in case I screw up, I'll just take pkg_delete -fa and start over :) Luckily, such updates as X do not happen that often (as far as I can remember it's just X, Gnome and perhaps KDE triggering large-scale compiler action). Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"