On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Stefan Bethke <s...@lassitu.de> wrote: > Am 12.03.2009 um 11:29 schrieb Emanuel Haupt: > >>>> $ sudo make >>>> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >>>> => bash-4.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo. >>>> => Either /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo is out of date, or >>>> => bash-4.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. >>>> *** Error code 1 >>>> >>>> Stop in /usr/ports/shells/bash. >>> >>> Update: After a recent ports tree update bash now builds correctly >>> here. >> >> The update still remains broken: >> >> [foo...@portjail ~]$ pkg_info >> bash-static-4.0.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell >> >> [r...@portjail ~]$ set -x >> [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) >> -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token >> `)' >> -bash: command substitution: line 25: `uname)' > > I also find this rather annoying. I believe that a rather large percentage > of people use bash as their default shell, so moving from 3.2 to 4.0 should > have been preceded by a headsup or an entry in UPDATING.
Hmm... But record in UPDATING won't cure the bug itself. Or error in the parsing $ echo $(ls) construct is not a bug? If it is not a bug but intended behavior, then could someone point me to the appropriate part of documentation? -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"