* Gabor Kovesdan <ga...@freebsd.org> wrote: > As for LLVM, probably it won't work out for the whole ports > tree. I don't know what's the portmgr opinion on this, if we start to > use LLVM in Ports Collection, we should reconsider the knob, though.
LLVM/Clang support is trivial. Erwin Lansing fired up an experimental ports build for us and the numbers are *very* promising. There are still some issues with the compiler itself, but so far it seems the only architectural change to the tree that needs to be made, is a hint to fall back to C89. This is not just about LLVM/Clang support. If the GCC folks ever decide to switch to C99 by default, we'll have exactly the same issue. -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpD8x3SqNiQm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
