Maho NAKATA wrote:
I did a benchmark with Virtualbox:
My environment:
* Core 2 Quad, q6...@3ghz
* Windows XP s...@host s...@vbox with GuestAddon
* http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalMark/
CrystalMark 2004R3
* Sapphire X1650
* VBOX is running on FBSD7.2-REL/amd64
using http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_5.tgz
* Running with fullscreen mode 1280x1024 32bit
Here is the result
-----------------------------------------
host(4CPU) host(1CPU) vbox(1CPU)
Mark 173047 90925 86496
ALU 50985 13493 13060
FPU 63746 15126 15323
MEM 21822 25582 16516
HDD 9336 9331 30600(*)
GDI 15153 15195 5127
D2D 5997 5998 5108
OGL 6200 6200 762
-----------------------------------------
(*)somehow lot faster
I don't know how to use two CPUs, even changing setting
doesn't change.
Usually I cannot usually launch VirtualBox even by root.
A workaround is that invoking and killing VirtualBox
many times for me. After some tries I can launch...
thanks
I take it that you're running freebsd on the "bare metal" in your 4CPU
and 1CPU tests, and running WinXP on the bare metal in the vbox test?
If so, are you using ATA disks and the ATA driver for all instances
of FreeBSD? If so, then the lack of NCQ in the FreeBSD ATA driver would
explain the HDD test result. I see similar results with VMWare.
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
