On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:34:12 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and > > other linux dri ports to be in conflict. > > > > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace > > libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good. Is it right to > > mark this port and other linux dri ports to be in conflict? > Weird, as this is the first report of that kind. Also, per what I see > in graphics/linux_dri{,-devel}, linuxish libGL* files go to usr/X11R6 > (under LINUXBASE, I assume), while nvidia-driver installs them under > usr/lib. Hm, you are right... BTW, new linux dri ports: . graphics/linux-f8-dri; . graphics/linux-f10-dri; . graphics/linux-dri74 istall libraries to usr/lib. Seems that those ports should be added to CONFLICTS. > I will dig that emulation@ message to take a closer look. Thanks, I'm also interested. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"