On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:28:02 +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote: > 2009/8/4 Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.po...@mailing.thruhere.net>: > > I think for the time being PySTE support should be off by default, > > because it pulls in a second libc and databases/akonadi plus kdeedu[34] > > use boost-python and because gccxml looks like a dead project. > > Agree. PySTE was disabled before boost split, would be nice to have it disabled for now also.
> > ports/123927 could be solved/prevented by using a WANT_BOOST_PYSTE in > > dependent ports that rely on boost having PYSTE and using PKGNAMESUFFIX > > plus pkg_info to verify if boost-python-libs is boost-python-pyste-libs - > > as a stop-gap. > > Well, if the user installs some port that depends on > boost-python-libs, the user gets boost-python-libs installed. Then the > user wants to install another port that depends on > boost-python-pyste-libs. Would this succeed? there is no any port depending on pyste and I doubt there will be one in near future. Pulling gcc3 for newer systems because of hardly potential inconvenience seems to be excessive for me. Regards, Max
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
