Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > [...] > >>> I have seen similar problem in the past with amavisd-new + spamassassin >>> and their dependencies, but it is much bigger and complicated tree of >>> dependencies and I have not evidence recorded for it. >>> Reported case with jpeg / gd / png is the simplest one I have seen. >> >> >> Were these other cases also with the -r option, or were they when >> doing "regular" upgrades? > > It was with regular upgrade, if I remember it well, but it was some time > ago... I'll track it better next time (if it occurs).
If it's failing on a regular upgrade I start to suspect weirdness in your local setup since that's a dead-simple thing that would be very hard for portmaster to get wrong. I'm also suspicious because I took a look at the code a couple times yesterday and even using -r each port should still be getting the full treatment, which includes upgrading dependencies as needed. I will however put some more time into testing it today and get back to you. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"