On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:16:11 +0200 Robert Nagy wrote:

> Noone cares?

A better way is to submit the patch as a followup to the PR.
Then this PR may be committed after a maintainer timeout. HTH

> On (2009-08-22 22:26), Robert Nagy wrote:
> > Basically - luasocket defines buffer_init(); which is common enough to be 
> > defined
> > elsewhere and it is defined in mod_magnet, so you end up with a SIGSEGV.
> > The attatched patch solves the issue by renaming the buffer_* funcs to 
> > ls_buffer_*.
> > Its a totally safe diff that does not affect anything else and fixes a 
> > problem.
> > 
> > I've commited this to OpenBSD already, but I need it on FreeBSD too.
> > 
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138055 contains a wrong diff,
> > sorry for that.
[patch skipped]

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to