On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:07 -0000, amdmi3 wrote:
* Alex Dupre ([email protected]) wrote:
heanet seems to be the only one that reach > 1MB/s from all the tested
locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list.
Agreed.
Also, I'd like at least one more result from USA.
Here is two:
From pairNetworks in PA
biznetnetworks: (411KB/s)
dfn: failed
freefr: (1.16MB/s)
garr: failed
heanet: (1013KB/s)
internode: (448KB/s)
iweb: (2.85MB/s)
jaist: (540KB/s)
kent: (645KB/s)
nchc: (301KB/s)
osdn: (280KB/s)
ovh: failed
softlayer: (364KB/s)
sunet: (434KB/s)
surfnet: (819KB/s)
switch: (802KB/s)
transact: (432KB/s)
ufpr: (274KB/s)
voxel: (2.65MB/s)
This one from: West Michigan
adsl-*.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net
biznetnetworks: (61.0 KB/s)
dfn: failed
freefr: (97.4 KB/s)
garr: failed
heanet: (37.1 KB/s)
internode: (58.3 KB/s)
iweb: (125 KB/s)
jaist: (45.0 KB/s)
kent: failed
nchc: failed
osdn: failed
ovh: failed
softlayer: (121 KB/s)
sunet: (75.8 KB/s)
surfnet: (94.8 KB/s)
switch: (112 KB/s)
transact: failed
ufpr: failed
voxel: failed
Good luck. When it has come to SF in the past I would choose a over
sea's mirror first.
--
- (2^(N-1))
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
