On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamik...@bsdforen.de>wrote:
> It has been suggested to me to split pkg_upgrade out of > sysutils/bsdadminscripts and create a separate port in > ports-mgmt/pkg_upgrade, because people have difficulty to find > it, unless they stumble over one of my shameless advertisements. > > This however is not compatible with my plan to share code between > scripts in the future. Hence the only alternative seems to me, > a meta port in ports-mgmt/pkg_upgrade that depends on > sysutils/bsdadminscripts. > > Would such a thing be accepted? I feel sceptical, because it does > not even depend on several packages and the real solution in my > opinion would be if people searched the ports tree with > "make quicksearch cat=ports-mgmt" instead of browsing the file > system. But they don't and I know of no way making them do it. > You could always split out the common code into a library port, and make that a dependency for the pkg_upgrade and bsdadminscripts ports. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
